1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Subthalamic beta targeted neurofeedback speeds up movement initiation but increases tremor in Parkinsonian patients

  1. Shenghong He
  2. Abteen Mostofi
  3. Emilie Syed
  4. Flavie Torrecillos
  5. Gerd Tinkhauser
  6. Petra Fischer
  7. Alek Pogosyan
  8. Harutomo Hasegawa
  9. Yuanqing Li
  10. Keyoumars Ashkan
  11. Erlick Pereira
  12. Peter Brown  Is a corresponding author
  13. Huiling Tan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. St George's University of London, United Kingdom
  3. Nuffield Dep of Clinical Neurosciences and MRC BNDU, United Kingdom
  4. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
  5. South China University of Technology, China
  6. Kings College London, United Kingdom
Research Article
  • Cited 0
  • Views 285
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e60979 doi: 10.7554/eLife.60979

Abstract

Previous studies have explored neurofeedback training for Parkinsonian patients to suppress beta oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). However, its impacts on movements and Parkinsonian tremor are unclear. We developed a neurofeedback paradigm targeting STN beta bursts and investigated whether neurofeedback training could improve motor initiation in Parkinson's disease compared to passive observation. Our task additionally allowed us to test which endogenous changes in oscillatory STN activities are associated with trial-to-trial motor performance. Neurofeedback training reduced beta synchrony and increased gamma activity within the STN, and reduced beta band coupling between the STN and motor cortex. These changes were accompanied by reduced reaction times in subsequently cued movements. However, in Parkinsonian patients with pre-existing symptoms of tremor, successful volitional beta suppression was associated with an amplification of tremor which correlated with theta band activity in STN LFPs, suggesting an additional cross-frequency interaction between STN beta and theta activities.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shenghong He

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Abteen Mostofi

    Neurosciences Research Centre, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Emilie Syed

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Flavie Torrecillos

    Clinical Neurosciences, Nuffield Dep of Clinical Neurosciences and MRC BNDU, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Gerd Tinkhauser

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Petra Fischer

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5585-8977
  7. Alek Pogosyan

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience; 2. Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Harutomo Hasegawa

    Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Yuanqing Li

    School of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Keyoumars Ashkan

    Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Keyoumars Ashkan, has received educational grants from Medtronic and Abbott.
  11. Erlick Pereira

    Neurosciences Research Centre, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Peter Brown

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    peter.brown@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Peter Brown, is a consultant for Medtronic..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5201-3044
  13. Huiling Tan

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    huiling.tan@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8038-3029

Funding

Medical Research Council (MR/P012272/1)

  • Shenghong He
  • Huiling Tan

Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12024/1)

  • Flavie Torrecillos
  • Gerd Tinkhauser
  • Petra Fischer
  • Alek Pogosyan
  • Peter Brown

National Institute for Health Research (Oxford Biomedical Research Centre)

  • Shenghong He
  • Abteen Mostofi
  • Emilie Syed
  • Flavie Torrecillos
  • Gerd Tinkhauser
  • Petra Fischer
  • Alek Pogosyan
  • Peter Brown
  • Huiling Tan

Rosetrees Trust

  • Shenghong He
  • Huiling Tan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from patients before they took part in the study, which was approved by Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee, reference number 18/SC/0006.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Preeya Khanna, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: July 12, 2020
  2. Accepted: November 16, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 18, 2020 (version 1)

Copyright

? 2020, He et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 285
    Page views
  • 74
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yanying Wu et al.
    Research Article

    Dietary magnesium (Mg2+) supplementation can enhance memory in young and aged rats. Memory-enhancing capacity was largely ascribed to increases in hippocampal synaptic density and elevated expression of the NR2B subunit of the NMDA-type glutamate receptor. Here we show that Mg2+ feeding also enhances long-term memory in Drosophila. Normal and Mg2+ enhanced fly memory appears independent of NMDA receptors in the mushroom body and instead requires expression of a conserved CNNM-type Mg2+-efflux transporter encoded by the unextended (uex) gene. UEX contains a putative cyclic nucleotide-binding homology domain and its mutation separates a vital role for uex from a function in memory. Moreover, UEX localization in mushroom body Kenyon Cells is altered in memory defective flies harboring mutations in cAMP-related genes. Functional imaging suggests that UEX-dependent efflux is required for slow rhythmic maintenance of Kenyon Cell Mg2+. We propose that regulated neuronal Mg2+ efflux is critical for normal and Mg2+ enhanced memory.

    1. Neuroscience
    Caitlin R Bowman et al.
    Research Article

    There is a long-standing debate about whether categories are represented by individual category members (exemplars) or by the central tendency abstracted from individual members (prototypes). Neuroimaging studies have shown neural evidence for either exemplar representations or prototype representations, but not both. Presently, we asked whether it is possible for multiple types of category representations to exist within a single task. We designed a categorization task to promote both exemplar and prototype representations and tracked their formation across learning. We found only prototype correlates during the final test. However, interim tests interspersed throughout learning showed prototype and exemplar representations across distinct brain regions that aligned with previous studies: prototypes in ventromedial prefrontal cortex and anterior hippocampus and exemplars in inferior frontal gyrus and lateral parietal cortex. These findings indicate that, under the right circumstances, individuals may form representations at multiple levels of specificity, potentially facilitating a broad range of future decisions.