1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
  2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Download icon

Rationally derived inhibitors of hepatitis C virus (HCV) p7 channel activity reveal prospect for bimodal antiviral therapy

Research Article
  • Cited 0
  • Views 572
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e52555 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52555

Abstract

Since the 1960s, a single class of agent has been licensed targeting virus-encoded ion channels, or 'viroporins', contrasting the success of channel blocking drugs in other areas of medicine. Although resistance arose to these prototypic adamantane inhibitors of the influenza A virus (IAV) M2 proton channel, a growing number of clinically and economically important viruses are now recognised to encode essential viroporins providing potential targets for modern drug discovery. We describe the first rationally designed viroporin inhibitor with a comprehensive structure-activity relationship (SAR). This step-change in understanding not only revealed a second biological function for the p7 viroporin from hepatitis C virus (HCV) during virus entry, but also enabled the synthesis of a labelled tool compound that retained biological activity. Hence, p7 inhibitors (p7i) represent a unique class of HCV antiviral targeting both the spread and establishment of infection, as well as a precedent for future viroporin-targeted drug discovery.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Joseph Shaw

    Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Rajendra Gosein

    School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Monoj Mon Kalita

    Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8037-8489
  4. Toshana L Foster

    School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jayakanth Kankanala

    School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. D Ram Mahato

    Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sonia Abas

    School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Barnabas J King

    School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8432-2282
  9. Claire Scott

    School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Emma Brown

    Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Matthew J Bentham

    School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Laura Wetherill

    Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Abigail Bloy

    Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Adel Samson

    Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Mark Harris

    School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Jamel Mankouri

    School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. David Rowlands

    School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Andrew Macdonald

    School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Alexander W Tarr

    School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1009-0823
  20. Wolfgang B Fischer

    Institute of Biophotonics, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Richard Foster

    School of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    r.foster@leeds.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Stephen Griffin

    Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    s.d.c.griffin@leeds.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7233-5243

Funding

Medical Research Council (G0700124)

  • Matthew J Bentham
  • Laura Wetherill
  • Stephen Griffin

Yorkshire Cancer Research Pump-Priming Award (PP025)

  • Toshana L Foster
  • Stephen Griffin

Leeds Teaching Hospitals Charitable Foundation (9R11/14-03)

  • Laura Wetherill
  • Stephen Griffin

Medical Research Council (MC.PC.13066)

  • Joseph Shaw
  • Rajendra Gosein
  • Richard Foster
  • Stephen Griffin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Melanie M Brinkmann, Technische Universit?t Braunschweig, Germany

Publication history

  1. Received: October 8, 2019
  2. Accepted: November 9, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 10, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: November 12, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: December 3, 2020 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record updated: December 3, 2020 (version 4)

Copyright

? 2020, Shaw et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 572
    Page views
  • 89
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Lin Bai et al.
    Research Article

    The P4 ATPases use ATP hydrolysis to transport large lipid substrates across lipid bilayers. The structures of the endosome- and Golgi-localized phosphatidylserine flippases—such as the yeast Drs2 and human ATP8A1—have recently been reported. However, a substrate binding site on the cytosolic side has not been found, and the transport mechanisms of P4 ATPases with other substrates are unknown. Here we report structures of the S. cerevisiae Dnf1–Lem3 and Dnf2–Lem3 complexes. We captured substrate phosphatidylcholine molecules on both the exoplasmic and cytosolic sides and found that they have similar structures. Unexpectedly, Lem3 contributes to substrate binding. The conformational transitions of these phosphatidylcholine transporters match those of the phosphatidylserine transporters, suggesting a conserved mechanism among P4 ATPases. Dnf1/Dnf2 have a unique P domain helix-turn-helix insertion that is important for function. Therefore, P4 ATPases may have retained an overall transport mechanism while evolving distinct features for different lipid substrates.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Zachary M March et al.
    Research Article

    The AAA+ protein disaggregase, Hsp104, increases fitness under stress by reversing stress-induced protein aggregation. Natural Hsp104 variants might exist with enhanced, selective activity against neurodegenerative disease substrates. However, natural Hsp104 variation remains largely unexplored. Here, we screened a cross-kingdom collection of Hsp104 homologs in yeast proteotoxicity models. Prokaryotic ClpG reduced TDP-43, FUS, and a-synuclein toxicity, whereas prokaryotic ClpB and hyperactive variants were ineffective. We uncovered therapeutic genetic variation among eukaryotic Hsp104 homologs that specifically antagonized TDP-43 condensation and toxicity in yeast and TDP-43 aggregation in human cells. We also uncovered distinct eukaryotic Hsp104 homologs that selectively antagonized a-synuclein condensation and toxicity in yeast and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in C. elegans. Surprisingly, this therapeutic variation did not manifest as enhanced disaggregase activity, but rather as increased passive inhibition of aggregation of specific substrates. By exploring natural tuning of this passive Hsp104 activity, we elucidated enhanced, substrate-specific agents that counter proteotoxicity underlying neurodegeneration.